Advanced Refrigeration - ARS2022001
#11of 108 in Water#42of 345 in United States#18of 147 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Audit Analysis
A straightforward one-time refrigerant replacement project (R-22 HCFC to low-GWP) in North Carolina, validated by Ruby Canyon Environmental under ACR's Advanced Refrigeration methodology v2.1. Additionality is confirmed via a combined test and the permanence profile is inherently strong because the reductions are fixed once the low-GWP refrigerant is installed. Main weaknesses are the project-specific baseline, a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible,' and low extraction confidence across the document set.
Red Flags
- Leakage deduction is 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' justification; no quantitative analysis of potential refrigerant leakage over the 10-year crediting period is documented in the validation report.
- The GWP value used in the initial ER calculation was incorrect (AR4 value instead of the required AR5 value of 1,710); the error was caught and corrected during validation, but it signals a quality-control gap in the project developer's methodology application.
- Low extraction confidence across the document set means at least one key document was poorly readable, limiting the depth of verification possible.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 19,002 | 19,001 | 1 | |
| Total | 19,002 | 19,001 | 1 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-confirmed
Fixed reductions post-installation, no reversal risk
0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' only
Project-specific, no reassessment date
Mentioned but grievance mechanism not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →