Skip to main content
ACRIndustrial Process EmissionsNEW JERSEY; OREGON; MASSACHUSETTS; OHIO, USGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Advanced Refrigeration - ARS2024001

ACR-1036 ↗

#65of 108 in Water#184of 345 in United States#84of 147 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

4.9/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A multi-site Advanced Refrigeration project in the US with VVB-confirmed additionality and a technology-based design that carries no carbon-stock reversal risk. However, the project suffers from a project-specific baseline with no documented reassessment, inconsistent leakage treatment between the validation and monitoring reports, six material findings (all documentation errors), and several key MRV parameters (FNRB, usage monitoring, CORSIA/CCP status) that are absent from the extracted record. The identical ERR figures across the lifetime estimate and the first (2.5-month) monitoring period warrant scrutiny, though for refrigerant-replacement projects the full avoidance may legitimately be claimed at the point of conversion.

Red Flags

  • The verified ERR of 43,156 tCO₂e equals the full lifetime ex-ante estimate despite the monitoring period covering only ~2.5 months of a 10-year crediting period; while a one-time refrigerant-avoidance calculation may explain this, the monitoring report does not explicitly state the calculation basis, making over-crediting risk difficult to rule out.
  • Leakage is treated as 'deemed negligible' in the monitoring report but is entirely unaddressed in the validation report, creating an inconsistency in the project's environmental accounting.
  • Six material findings were raised by the VVB (First Environment), including incorrect GPS coordinates, mismatched cooling capacities, and a project start-date inconsistency, all requiring corrective action before the monitoring report can be considered final.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2024
43,15628,60814,548
Total43,15628,60814,548

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Technology-based; no carbon-stock reversal risk

Leakage

Deemed negligible but inconsistently documented

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC not conducted; grievance mechanism absent

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents