Skip to main content
ACRIndustrial Process EmissionsMISSOURI, USGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Advanced Refrigeration CAN - ARS 004C

ACR-600 ↗

#83of 110 in Water#270of 389 in United States#146of 195 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

4.4/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

This ACR-registered advanced refrigeration project (ARS 004C, Missouri/US) has VVB-confirmed additionality via a combined test, but the verification report identified eight material findings—including incorrect baseline charge sizes, misclassified equipment, and monitoring-plan deficiencies—each requiring corrective action. The 0% leakage deduction lacks a consistent justification across documents, and the ex-ante lifetime estimate (480) sits at a very different magnitude from the verified 2019 figure (480,748), raising questions about unit consistency or baseline robustness. Overall, the project is structurally sound but carries meaningful data-quality and baseline-accuracy concerns.

Red Flags

  • Eight material findings in the May 2021 verification report, including incorrect baseline default charge sizes and incorrect equipment classification in the ACR599 dataset, directly undermine baseline accuracy
  • Leakage deduction of 0% is justified as 'deemed negligible' in the PDD but listed as 'not addressed' in the validation report—an inconsistency that weakens the leakage treatment
  • The ex-ante lifetime estimate of 480 (validation report, Dec 2020) and the verified 2019 figure of 480,748 (verification report, May 2021) differ by three orders of magnitude; if both are in the same unit, the project delivered roughly 10,000% of the pro-rata expectation, which is implausible and suggests a unit or scope error
  • Usage monitoring method is listed as 'assumed' with a usage rate of 7.75 that was never independently verified, reducing confidence in the activity-level data

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
34,725034,725
Total34,725034,725

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

Technology-based; no carbon-stock reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, justification inconsistent across docs

Baseline

Project-specific; material findings on charge sizes

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents