Skip to main content
ACRIndustrial Process EmissionsMISSOURI, USGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Advanced Refrigeration US49 - ARS 003

ACR-481 ↗

#79of 110 in Water#265of 389 in United States#141of 195 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

4.5/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The Advanced Refrigeration US49 project has VVB-confirmed additionality and no carbon-stock reversal risk, but is undermined by eleven material findings—including three that directly distort emission calculations (uniform charge size, incorrect R-290 GWP, wrong baseline charge sizes)—and a contradictory leakage justification. The project delivered roughly 371% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation in the first three years of a twelve-year crediting period, raising over-crediting concerns that are compounded by the calculation errors flagged by the VVB.

Red Flags

  • Three material findings directly affect emission-quantification accuracy: a uniform 1.2 kg charge size applied to all refrigeration systems instead of equipment-specific values, an R-290 GWP inconsistent with the methodology table, and incorrect or missing baseline default charge sizes (verification report, 2021-04-11).
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the validation report (2021-04-06) states leakage was 'not addressed,' while the PDD (2021-02) claims it was 'deemed negligible,' yet the deduction is 0% with no quantified analysis.
  • The project delivered 1,000,000 tCO₂e in a 3-year monitoring window against a pro-rata ex-ante expectation of only ~269,000 tCO₂e (371% of expectation), a concentration that, combined with the calculation errors, raises over-crediting risk.
  • SSR 7 (Equipment Disposal) was incorrectly excluded from the project boundary, potentially omitting a source of emissions or reductions (verification report).

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
371,461248,318123,143
Total371,461248,318123,143

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

No reversal risk (refrigeration)

Leakage

0% deduction, contradictory justification

Baseline

Project-specific, no reassessment recorded

Safeguards

Mentioned but details absent

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents