Skip to main content
ICRAgricultureItalyVintage 2023, 2024, 2025VM0042

AgroEcology_Italy

CT-730 ↗

#75of 261 in Soil carbon#1of 5 in Italy#29of 154 in Intl. Carbon Registry (ICR)#6of 25 in VM0042

5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The AgroEcology_Italy soil-carbon project under the ICR Standard shows a verified additionality assessment and a 10% buffer pool, but is undermined by eight cross-document contradictions—particularly on baseline method, grievance mechanism, and FPIC status. The verified emissions for the first two-year monitoring period (7,159.67) represent only about 0.1% of the pro-rata lifetime expectation (≈6.86 million), raising serious questions about the validity of the ex-ante estimate or a unit mismatch. The 0% leakage deduction for a soil-carbon agriculture project is thin on justification.

Red Flags

  • Verified emissions (7,159.67) are only ~0.1% of the pro-rata two-year expectation derived from the 51.4-million ex-ante lifetime estimate, suggesting either a unit inconsistency or a grossly inflated ex-ante baseline
  • The PDD states FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism exists, while the monitoring report claims both are in place—a direct contradiction on fundamental safeguards
  • Baseline method is described as 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report but 'project-specific' in the validation report, with no reconciliation documented
  • Leakage deduction of 0% is justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis, which is weak for a soil-carbon agriculture project where displacement of carbon stocks is a realistic risk

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Il marketplace dichiara i vintage: 2023, 2024, 2025 (non verificato).

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified but initially anecdotal; test type contradictory across documents

Permanence

10% buffer pool applied; no reversal events reported

Leakage

0% deduction with only 'deemed negligible' justification; no quantified analysis

Baseline

Method contradictory (jurisdictional vs project-specific); reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism contradictory between PDD and monitoring report

Double-claim

Not CORSIA-eligible; CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03VM0042

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents