Skip to main content
CDMMethane avoidanceHondurasAMS-III.H

Aguan biogas recovery from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) ponds and biogas utilisation - Exportadora del Atlántico, Aguan/Honduras

CDM-3197 ↗

#208of 268 in Biogas#16of 20 in Honduras#1320of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#45of 55 in AMS-III.H

4.1/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
3.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

The Aguan POME biogas project has a solid additionality foundation (VVB-confirmed investment test by TÜV SÜD) and resolved validation findings, but is undermined by a severe seven-fold discrepancy in claimed emissions reductions between the validation report and an appendix, a contradiction in baseline methodology, and a near-total absence of monitoring or verification data. The low extraction confidence and missing key parameters (buffer pool, FN-RB, usage rates, verified ERR) leave substantial uncertainty about the project's actual credit volume and integrity.

Red Flags

  • Seven-fold discrepancy in total claimed ERR: 30,183 tCO₂e in the validation report versus 211,284 tCO₂e in an appendix — a factor-of-7 gap that cannot be reconciled without further documentation
  • Baseline method contradicted across documents: the validation report describes a project-specific baseline while an appendix references a jurisdictional baseline, fundamentally altering the credit calculation
  • No monitoring period, verified ERR, or usage monitoring method found in any available document — the project's actual performance is entirely unverified
  • Leakage treatment contradicted: the validation report states leakage was 'deemed negligible' (0% deduction) while an appendix indicates it was 'quantified', creating ambiguity about whether a real deduction was applied
  • Low extraction confidence across the document set, meaning at least one key document was poorly readable and critical data may be missing

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction, contradictory justification

Baseline

Project-specific, method contradicted

Safeguards

Mentioned but no FPIC or grievance detail

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS-III.H, AMS-I.C, AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents