Vai al contenuto principale
GS Wind Turkey Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Alize Camseki 20.8 MW Wind Farm Project, Turkey (300209)

GS-1407 ↗

5.0 / 10
Integrity
5.6
Transparency
4.8
Claim Safety
5.1
Documentation
3.6

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB, and the project uses a combined additionality test under ACM0002.

missing Leakage treatment is weakly supported: the record shows a leakage deduction of 0% and the contradiction log says earlier documents treated leakage as not addressed.

Transparency

verified The monitoring period is stated for 2023-07-01 to 2023-12-31, and the VVB is identified as Re Carbon Ltd.

missing Key transparency fields are missing or incomplete, including the verified emission reduction total, usage monitoring method, and FNRB information.

Claim Safety

verified The project is not shown to have double registration, and it is marked as CORSIA-eligible in the extracted record.

missing Claim safety is weakened by the project-specific baseline, missing FNRB data, and contradictions in the crediting period and leakage treatment.

Documentation

verified The record draws on many documents, with 23 documents used and several corrective actions showing active review.

missing Extraction confidence is low, one evidence document is listed only as unknown, and the monitoring report includes many formatting and consistency issues.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The project has a positive integrity signal because the verification report confirms additionality and the project uses a combined test under ACM0002. However, the baseline is project-specific and last reassessed in 2010, the leakage deduction is 0%, and the contradiction log shows earlier documents treated leakage as not addressed, which weakens confidence in the environmental claims.

Transparency

Transparency is moderate at best: the monitoring period is clearly stated and the VVB is named as Re Carbon Ltd., but the extracted record does not state the verified emission reduction total, the usage monitoring method, or FNRB values. The monitoring report also contains numerous internal errors and corrective actions, which suggests the reporting package is not fully clean.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is limited by missing quantitative safeguards around usage and FNRB, plus a project-specific baseline rather than a more standardized or recently reassessed baseline. The project is marked CORSIA-eligible, which does not by itself create a problem, but it means the claim should be treated cautiously because the record does not clearly rule out broader market-claim complexity.

Documentation

Documentation quality is weak because extraction confidence is low, one evidence document is not identified, and the monitoring report required many corrective actions and revisions. The record does show active verification and closure of several corrective actions, but the number of documentation issues and the missing/unclear fields reduce confidence in the completeness of the file.

Overall

I privileged the more recent monitoring-report evidence for the current period, but I also gave weight to the contradiction log because it shows unresolved reliability issues across documents. Specifically, I treated the VVB-confirmed combined additionality test as stronger than the older barrier-test reference, but I discounted the score because the record also shows contradictions on leakage treatment, reversal status, and the crediting period. The low extraction confidence and the many corrective actions further justify a conservative overall score.

Audit Analysis

This is a real wind project with VVB-confirmed additionality and a documented monitoring process, but the evidence quality is uneven. The record shows multiple corrective actions, low extraction confidence, missing key MRV fields, and contradictions on additionality, leakage treatment, reversal status, and crediting period, which reduce confidence in the claims.

Project Description

Developer: Alize Enerji Elektrik Uretim Anonim Sirketi Type: Wind Size: Large Scale Methodology: ACM0002 Grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources Crediting period: 2009-07-01 → 2030-06-30 Estimated annual credits: 39634 tCO2e SDGs: Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy, Goal 13: Climate Action

Red Flags

  • Multiple contradictions across documents on additionality, leakage treatment, reversal status, and the crediting period reduce reliability.
  • The monitoring report contains numerous corrective actions and several documentation errors, while key MRV details such as total verified reductions and usage monitoring are not stated.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2009
21,581 21,581 0
2010
39,989 39,981 8
2011
45,204 45,204 0
2012
56,058 56,058 0
2013
14,687 14,687 0
2022
18,085 0 18,085
2023
14,642 0 14,642
Total 210,246 177,511 32,735

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Provide a clean, reconciled verification package that resolves the contradictions on additionality, leakage, reversal status, and the crediting period.
  • Disclose the missing MRV details, especially verified emission reductions, usage monitoring method, FNRB values, and any buffer or permanence treatment.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

No reversal event, but buffer not stated

Leakage

0% deduction with weak support

Baseline

Project baseline, reassessment timing old

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism documented

Double-claim

CORSIA-eligible; CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-19 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti