Skip to main content
VCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UseBrazil Registry: RegisteredVM0007

Amazon Biome Conservancy Grouped REDD+ Project

VCS-4016 ↗

#131of 261 in Soil carbon#121of 211 in Brazil#903of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#11of 27 in VM0007

4.7/ 10
Integrity
4.3
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.2
Documentation
4.2

Audit Analysis

This grouped REDD+ project in the Brazilian Amazon has a verified additionality assessment and a 10% buffer pool, but the verification process surfaced 27 material findings and 11 corrective actions covering baseline validity, land tenure, deforestation rate justification, and leakage monitoring. The project is over-delivering relative to its pro-rata expectation, yet the project-specific baseline with an unclear deforestation rate and insufficient site-specific threat demonstration creates meaningful over-crediting risk. Documentation quality is below standard, with missing geospatial files, incomplete land registry evidence, and internal inconsistencies across documents.

Red Flags

  • 27 material findings and 11 corrective actions required by the VVB, including insufficient demonstration of immediate site-specific deforestation threat and unclear deforestation rate assessment
  • Ex-ante lifetime ERR revised downward by approximately 43% (from 2,937,792.88 in the stakeholder consultation to 1,672,222.15 in the validation report), indicating initial over-estimation
  • Carbon stock data sourced from secondary sources is higher than UNFCCC Fourth Communication figures, raising potential over-estimation of baseline carbon stocks
  • Potential threat to VVB impartiality flagged as a material finding, undermining confidence in the verification process
  • Land tenure and ownership documentation is incomplete, with missing INCRA proceedings, rural environmental registry codes, and specific land registry numbers

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Buffer pool present but NP risk evidence insufficient

Leakage

Quantified but pct unstated; activity-shifting justification insufficient

Baseline

Project-specific; deforestation rate and threat demonstration unclear

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance present; AFOLU safeguards and stakeholder communication gaps

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-08VM0007

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents