Anew - Northern Algoma Forest Project
#62of 69 in REDD+#10of 11 in Canada#43of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Audit Analysis
The project record lacks nearly all verification, monitoring, and methodological data required for a robust assessment. Without documented additionality testing, baseline application, or independent validation, environmental claims cannot be substantiated. Substantial evidence gaps leave the project highly vulnerable to over-crediting and double-counting risks.
Red Flags
- Near-total absence of verification reports, monitoring periods, and MRV documentation
- Unconfirmed CORSIA and CCP eligibility status raises double-counting exposure
- No documented additionality assessment or baseline reassessment timeline
- Leakage not addressed in project documentation
- Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
No assessment found
Buffer contribution unverified
No treatment documented
Method not stated
None documented
Eligibility unconfirmed
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
