Are Treindustrier, Norway
#100of 352 in Biomass#3of 5 in Norway#33of 111 in Puro.earth (PUR)
Audit Analysis
Are Treindustrier is a Puro-registered alternative-materials project in Norway with a reputable VVB (DNV), a 10% buffer pool, and no adverse findings. However, critical integrity elements — additionality testing, baseline methodology, and leakage treatment — are absent from the extracted record, and the two verification reports show different ERR figures (8,610 vs 13,644 tCO₂) that appear to reflect separate monitoring periods but were not explicitly reconciled. The project's LCA, carbon-content testing, and feedstock-sustainability documentation provide some assurance, but the overall evidentiary base is thin.
Red Flags
- Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in any available document, leaving the core additionality claim unverified in the extracted record.
- Baseline methodology and last reassessment date are entirely absent; no basis for the 50-year permanence claim is documented.
- Leakage deduction and justification are both missing — for a biomass alternative-materials project where displaced material could be used elsewhere, this is a notable gap.
- Two verification reports (July 2021 and December 2022) report different total ERR values (13,644.13 vs 8,610.19 tCO₂); while likely reflecting different monitoring periods, no document explicitly reconciles the two figures.
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 13,644 | 13,644 | 0 | |
| 2022 | 8,610 | 8,610 | 0 | |
| Total | 22,254 | 22,254 | 0 |
Risk Indicators
Not stated in available documents
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
Not addressed in extracted record
Method and reassessment not stated
Not stated in available documents
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →