Vai al contenuto principale
avoidance Turkey Vintage 2023 Documentazione parziale General Methodology v2.0

Atik WPP

CT-373 ↗

1.5 / 10
Integrity
2.0
Transparency
0.5
Claim Safety
2.0
Documentation
1.0

Score Breakdown

Integrity

missing Additionality, baseline approach, leakage treatment, and any findings/corrective actions were not found in the extracted record

inferred Renewable energy is typically low reversal risk, but permanence/buffer provisions are not documented here

Transparency

missing No VVB/assurance details, monitoring period, or error checks were found in the extracted record

missing Registry/public-data completeness cannot be assessed because no evidence documents were captured

Claim Safety

missing CORSIA/CCP status and double-claim controls were not found in the extracted record

missing Baseline and grid/emissions factor assumptions were not found, increasing over-crediting risk

Documentation

missing No evidence documents were captured (0 documents used), indicating severe documentation gaps

missing Minimum extraction confidence is low, reducing confidence in any missing/partial fields

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

No official documents were available in the extracted record, so additionality testing, baseline methodology, leakage treatment, and any material findings or corrective actions cannot be confirmed. For an avoidance renewable energy project, integrity hinges on credible baseline/grid factor and robust MRV, but these elements were not found. Given the evidence gap, the score is conservative.

Transparency

The extracted record contains no verification/assurance body name, monitoring period, or quantified checks (e.g., claimed vs verified emission reductions). With zero documents captured and low extraction confidence, there is insufficient basis to assess MRV quality or registry completeness beyond the basic identifier provided.

Claim Safety

Key claim-safety indicators—such as CORSIA eligibility, CCP status, and controls against double claiming—were not found in the extracted record. Baseline and emissions factor assumptions (critical for renewable energy crediting) are also not documented here, increasing the risk that claims could be overstated or not comparable to best practice.

Documentation

No evidence documents were captured (0 documents used), and the minimum extraction confidence is low, indicating poor readability or missing sources. This is a severe documentation deficiency that prevents substantiation of core quality attributes and should trigger conservative scoring. (Gate note: documentation below 3.0 would cap transparency post-scoring.)

Overall

There are no listed contradictions, but the absence of any extracted project documents dominates the assessment and drives low scores across all dimensions. With no monitoring/verification reports, PDD-equivalent, or registry documentation in the extracted record, the project’s integrity and claim safety cannot be validated. The overall score reflects high uncertainty rather than confirmed poor performance.

Audit Analysis

Only minimal project identifiers are available; no official project documents were found in the extracted record. As a result, additionality, baseline setting, monitoring/verification quality, and any safeguards cannot be substantiated, creating high uncertainty and elevated over-crediting/greenwashing risk.

Project Description

Description of the area and its socioeconomical context The Atik RES wind plant is located in the Belen district of Hatay province, Turkey. The area is mountainous and has a Mediterranean climate. The socioeconomic context of the area is mixed, with some people living in poverty and others being relatively well-off. The plant is expected to provide economic benefits to the local community, such as job creation and tax revenue. History of the plant The Atik RES wind plant was commissioned in 2018. It is owned and operated by Atik Energy, a Turkish renewable energy company. The plant consists of 25 wind turbines, each with a capacity of 2 MW. The total capacity of the plant is 50 MW. Description of the plant The Atik RES wind plant is located on a 1,000-hectare site. The turbines are located on hills and mountains, with an average elevation of 1,200 meters. The plant's annual production is 120 GWh, which is enough to power over 50,000 homes. Description of the IRECs IRECs, or International Renewable Energy Certificates, are tradable certificates that represent the generation of 1 MWh of renewable energy. They are used to track and verify the generation of renewable energy, and they can be used to offset the emissions of fossil fuel-fired power plants. How IRECs benefit climate change and renewable energy certificates IRECs help to promote the development of renewable energy by providing a financial incentive for companies to generate renewable energy. They also help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by offsetting the emissions of fossil fuel-fired power plants. In addition to the environmental benefits, IRECs also have social benefits. They can help to create jobs in the renewable energy sector, and they can provide economic benefits to local communities. Information of the IREC can be found here: https://evident.app/IREC/device-register/ATIKWIND001 Atik WPP is a subsidiary of Guris.

Red Flags

  • No project documents were available in the extracted record (0 documents used), so key quality claims cannot be verified
  • Low extraction confidence indicates at least one key source was poorly readable, further reducing reliability

Credit Vintages

Nessuna emissione registrata sul registro.

Il marketplace dichiara i vintage: 2023 (non verificato).

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Provide the core I-REC documentation set (registration, production/issuance records, audit/assurance statement, and monitoring/measurement procedures) so baseline and MRV can be evaluated
  • Disclose third-party assurance details (auditor/VVB, monitoring period, any findings/corrective actions) and explicitly state CORSIA/CCP status and double-claim prevention measures

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No additionality assessment found

Permanence

Low reversal risk type, but not documented

Leakage

No leakage treatment found

Baseline

Baseline method not found

Safeguards

No safeguards evidence found

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-02 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione parziale

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti