Avoidance of Methane Emissions at Organic Compost Soil Amendment Facility
GS-500 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2772
#997of 1329 in Industrial#241of 345 in United States#1428of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#55of 66 in ACM0010
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard methane-avoidance composting project with a confirmed investment additionality test and FPIC, but significant concerns around a project-specific modeled baseline, unaddressed permanence risk, and a verified emission reduction that is only about 27% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation. Multiple calculation errors in the original submissions were caught and corrected by the VVB, but the overall data quality and claim robustness remain moderate.
Red Flags
- Verified ERR of 5,352 tCO2e for the 2015 monitoring period is only ~27% of the pro-rata expectation (~20,140 tCO2e) derived from the PDD lifetime estimate of 201,395 tCO2e over a 10-year crediting period, indicating a major under-delivery relative to the ex-ante baseline.
- Reversal events are explicitly 'not addressed' in the verification report and no buffer pool percentage is stated, leaving permanence risk unquantified for a methane-avoidance project.
- Six material findings in the verification report reveal systematic calculation errors (fixed 90/10 ratio applied instead of actual weights, unsubstantiated baseline transportation emissions, non-conservative N2O emission factors), suggesting the original project documentation was not rigorously prepared.
- Leakage treatment is contradictory: the verification report (2017) states leakage was 'deemed negligible' with a 0% deduction, while the 2013 appendix indicates leakage was 'not addressed' at all.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5,352 | 5,258 | 94 | |
| Total | 5,352 | 5,258 | 94 |
Risk Indicators
Investment test present but VVB confirmation not explicitly stated; PDD versions differ
Reversal events not addressed
0% deduction with 'deemed negligible' claim, contradicted by earlier appendix
Project-specific modeled baseline; no reassessment date found
FPIC conducted, grievance mechanism and benefit sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status both not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →