Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaAMS-I.D

Bagasse Based cogeneration power project of Rana Sugars Limited, Amritsar District, Punjab;

CDM-0355 ↗

#114of 352 in Biomass#598of 975 in India#875of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#374of 806 in AMS-I.D

4.9/ 10
Integrity
4.8
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM bagasse cogeneration project with VVB-confirmed additionality but significant methodological concerns flagged by the verifier, including unsubstantiated baseline validity and leakage calculations. The project delivered only about 25% of its pro-rata expected emissions reductions in the first monitoring year, and key monitoring parameters remain unreported. The combination of four corrective action requests and a baseline-method contradiction between the validation and monitoring reports undermines confidence in the credit quality.

Red Flags

  • CAR #4 in the monitoring report states the project proponent failed to demonstrate the validity of the original/current baseline — a fundamental integrity concern
  • CAR #5 states the approach used to calculate leakage and project emissions was not substantiated, yet the project claims a 0% leakage deduction with a 'quantified' justification
  • Baseline method is contradictory: the validation report (2009) records a jurisdictional baseline while the monitoring report (2010) records a project-specific baseline
  • Verified ERR figure is not stated in any available document, making independent verification of actual emissions reductions impossible
  • Only one year of monitoring data (2009–2010) is available for a seven-year crediting period ending in 2016

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
152,2760152,276
Total152,2760152,276

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test

Permanence

no reversal events (energy project)

Leakage

0% deduction; VVB found approach unsubstantiated

Baseline

Method contradictory; CAR #4 questions validity

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents