Big Bend
#22of 69 in REDD+#28of 115 in United States#5of 32 in Climate Action Reserve (CAR)
Audit Analysis
The Big Bend forest project demonstrates moderate environmental integrity through a substantial leakage deduction and buffer pool contribution, but suffers from significant documentation gaps. The absence of verification reports, VVB confirmation, and recent baseline reassessments limits confidence in ongoing compliance and additionality.
Red Flags
- No third-party verification or monitoring reports available to confirm credit issuance
- Additionality assessment methodology and independent verification status are completely missing
- Safeguards documentation is absent, including FPIC confirmation and grievance mechanisms
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
No assessment found
Buffer pool present, reversal risk unaddressed
Quantified 20% deduction
Project-specific, reassessment missing
No safeguards documented
Eligibility status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
