Biogas based power generation project at Jeongeup-si
#12of 268 in Biogas#3of 24 in South Korea#268of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#154of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
A CDM biogas power-generation project in South Korea with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a jurisdictional grid baseline, but hampered by four corrective action requests (plant load factor, baseline emission factor, start date, monitoring plan) and a contradiction in baseline method between the validation and monitoring reports. The project is an avoidance-type activity with low permanence risk and a reasonable 0% leakage deduction, yet several key MRV parameters (FNRB, usage rate) are absent from the extracted record.
Red Flags
- Baseline method is reported as 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report (2014) but 'project-specific' in the validation report (2014-05-30); the more robust jurisdictional reading is privileged, but the inconsistency undermines confidence in the baseline.
- Four corrective action requests (CARs) were raised by the VVB covering plant load factor substantiation, baseline emission factor calculation, project start-date definition, and the monitoring plan for imported electricity — all resolved before issuance but indicating initial methodological gaps.
- FNRB value and method are not stated in any available document, leaving the netting of avoided emissions to other sinks unquantified in the extracted record.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 408 | 0 | 408 | |
| Total | 408 | 0 | 408 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Avoidance project, no reversals
0% justified for on-site combustion
Method contradiction (jurisdictional vs project)
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →