Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaACM0006

Biomass based Cogeneration Project activity taken up by India Glycols Limited at Gorakhpur, U.P.

CDM-3763 ↗

#222of 352 in Biomass#859of 975 in India#1325of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#34of 81 in ACM0006

4.1/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM biomass cogeneration project with solid additionality evidence (combined test, negative NPV, technological barriers confirmed by DNV), but undermined by a 10× discrepancy in claimed emissions reductions between the PDD and validation report, a project-specific baseline, a thin 0% leakage justification, and nine corrective actions flagged at validation. The absence of any monitoring-period data, verified ERR figures, or FNRB information in the extracted record leaves the project's actual performance unassessable.

Red Flags

  • 10× discrepancy in total ERR: the PDD (2010-12-07) states 1,101,570 tCO₂e while the validation report (2010-12-14) states 110,157 tCO₂e — a factor-of-ten gap that raises serious data-reliability concerns
  • Nine corrective actions required at validation, including rectification of project emission calculations for coal and DG set, boiler capacity inconsistencies, and missing monitoring-plan parameters (NCV of coal, biomass moisture, fossil-fuel quantities)
  • Leakage deduction of 0% justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis or documented rationale in the extracted record
  • No monitoring-period data, verified ERR, or FNRB value found in any available document — actual credit delivery cannot be assessed
  • Low extraction confidence across the document set, with one document of unknown type, limiting the reliability of the extracted evidence base

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test; negative NPV and barriers docum

Permanence

Energy-substitution project; no carbon stock; no reversal ev

Leakage

0% deduction; 'deemed negligible' without quantified analysi

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; no FPIC or grievan

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26ACM0006

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents