Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaAMS-I.C

Biomass based Cogeneration unit at Co-operative Sugar mills in Morinda, Punjab, India

CDM-5728 ↗

#229of 352 in Biomass#870of 975 in India#1350of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#78of 115 in AMS-I.C

4.0/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM biomass cogeneration project with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test, but significant data gaps in monitoring, verified emissions, and leakage justification. A contradiction between the PDD and validation report on baseline classification, combined with low extraction confidence and the absence of any monitoring-period data, limits confidence in the project's claimed 670,600 tCO₂e.

Red Flags

  • Baseline method contradicts between the PDD (jurisdictional) and the validation report (project-specific), both dated 14 May 2012, creating uncertainty about the actual baseline construction
  • No monitoring-period data, verified ERR, or FN/RB values are available in the extracted record, making it impossible to validate the 670,600 tCO₂e lifetime claim
  • Leakage deduction of 0% is justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis, which is thin for a biomass project where feedstock could displace other uses
  • 16 Corrective Action Requests were raised during validation (all closed), indicating substantial documentation or design issues at the time of registration
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, meaning at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of all extracted facts

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

low inherent risk for biomass energy

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' only

Baseline

Contradiction: project vs jurisdictional

Safeguards

Mentioned; FPIC and grievance not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26AMS I.C.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents