Biomass based thermal energy generation at M/s. Ester Industries limited, Khatima, Uttarakhand, India
#74of 352 in Biomass#470of 975 in India#657of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#26of 115 in AMS-I.C
Audit Analysis
A CDM biomass energy substitution project validated by SGS with a VVB-confirmed common-practice additionality test, but the investment barrier was removed during validation and the baseline was revised from coal to furnace oil, introducing moderate uncertainty. Leakage is claimed as negligible with a 0% deduction, and several key operational parameters (FNRB, usage rate, grid emission factor) are absent from the extracted record. The project delivered roughly 103% of its pro-rata credit expectation for the first monitoring period, which is reassuring, but the overall documentation set covers only one monitoring window of a seven-year crediting period.
Red Flags
- Investment barrier was removed from the additionality analysis during validation, leaving only the prevailing-practice ('first of its kind') barrier as the sole basis — a single-barrier additionality case is weaker than a multi-barrier one.
- Baseline fuel was revised from coal to furnace oil during validation, a material change that reduces the claimed emission factor but also signals that the original PDD baseline may not have reflected actual practice.
- Leakage deduction is 0% with a 'deemed negligible' justification, yet an appendix document apparently contained a quantified leakage estimate, creating an inconsistency in how leakage was ultimately treated.
- Nine corrective action requests and eight clarification requests were raised and closed during validation, indicating a substantial number of issues that had to be resolved before the project could be registered.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 10,725 | 0 | 10,725 | |
| Total | 10,725 | 0 | 10,725 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but single-barrier (investment barrier removed
Energy substitution; no carbon stock at risk; no reversals
0% deduction, 'deemed negligible'; appendix inconsistency
Project-specific; revised from coal to furnace oil during va
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →