Skip to main content
ScoredCARLandfill Gas Capture/CombustionALABAMA, USRegistry: RegisteredGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Black Warrior Solid Waste Facility

Developer: Anew Environmental, LLC

CAR-403 ↗

#63of 559 in Methane#291of 1692 in United States#124of 883 in Climate Action Reserve (CAR)

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.8 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

The Black Warrior Solid Waste Facility is a landfill gas capture project with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a measured baseline, but it is undermined by the absence of any stated leakage treatment, a project-specific baseline, and a pattern of QA/QC deficiencies (calibration, monitoring plan gaps) that required multiple corrective actions. Nine cross-document contradictions—several involving safeguards, grievance mechanisms, and benefit-sharing—raise data-reliability concerns, though most are explainable by differing document dates and types.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    CCP-labelled credits

    The registry marks these credits with the Core Carbon Principles label of the Integrity Council.

    Source: registry label

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
68,27168,2710
2010
71,71871,7180
2011
71,79250,22121,571
2012
56,484056,484
2013
32,798032,798
2020
49,48849,4880
2021
28,49928,4990
2022
29,45529,4550
2023
47,94647,9460
2024
65,612065,612
Total522,063345,598176,465

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →