Skip to main content
VCSWaste handling and disposalBrazil Registry: RegisteredAMS-III.D

Brascarbon Methane Recovery Project BCA-BRA-20

VCS-4970 ↗

#42of 104 in Brazil#385of 629 in Verra (VCS)#19of 62 in AMS-III.D

5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

The Brascarbon Methane Recovery Project is a VCS-registered waste-sector project using AMS III-D methodology with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test, but it carries a notable number of material findings (seven) and corrective actions (eleven) that raise concerns about the robustness of its additionality demonstration, baseline modelling, and monitoring data quality. The absence of a buffer pool, a thin leakage justification, and multiple inter-document contradictions (particularly on additionality test type and baseline characterisation) temper an otherwise structurally sound project. Overall, the project is functional but sits in the middle of the quality range, with room for significant improvement in documentation consistency and methodological rigour.

Red Flags

  • Seven material findings reported in the verification report, including an inconsistency in the additionality assessment between the V&V report and the PD&MR (regulatory vs. barrier analysis) and default values (VSdefault, Wdefault) not correctly sourced from the latest IPCC guidelines.
  • Eleven corrective actions required, spanning project start date definition, KML file completeness, stakeholder engagement clarity, SDG monitoring details, and alignment of Wsite monitoring with AMS III.D Clarifications.
  • No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unaddressed despite the project's 7-year crediting period.
  • Five contradictions identified across documents, including conflicting characterisation of the baseline (modelled vs. measured), the additionality test type (investment vs. combined), and the presence of a grievance mechanism (true vs. false) between the 2024 and 2025 monitoring reports.
  • Leakage deduction of 0% justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis, while the validation report (Dec 2025) characterises the justification as 'quantified' — an unresolved inconsistency.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2023
47,428047,428
Total47,428047,428

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but inconsistent across documents

Permanence

No buffer pool stated; low inherent reversal risk for methan

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' justification, contradicte

Baseline

Project-specific, modelled; no reassessment yet due under VC

Safeguards

FPIC conducted, grievance mechanism present, safeguards docu

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24AMS III-D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents