Skip to main content
carbonBulgariaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Briyastovo Wheat Farm

DV-ad4f84

#5of 6 in Bulgaria

0.8/ 10
Integrity
1.0
Transparency
0.0
Claim Safety
1.0
Documentation
1.0

Audit Analysis

The Briyastovo Wheat Farm project (DOVU dMRV, Bulgaria) presents a near-total evidence gap: virtually no verifiable data on additionality, baseline, leakage, permanence, or MRV was extractable from the available documents. The two source documents are of unknown type and were read with low confidence, making it impossible to confirm any positive integrity or transparency attributes. This project cannot be meaningfully assessed for credit quality on the current record.

Red Flags

  • No additionality test, baseline method, or VVB verification is documented in any available source — the entire integrity case is unverifiable
  • Both source documents are of unknown type and were extracted with low confidence, meaning even the empty findings list may reflect extraction failure rather than a clean audit
  • No leakage treatment, buffer pool, or permanence mechanism is stated for a wheat-farming project where land-use change and soil carbon reversal are plausible risks
  • Project name in the extracted record ('Ivan and Neli Farm') differs from the registered project title ('Briyastovo Wheat Farm'), raising a minor identity-verification concern

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No additionality assessment found

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

No leakage treatment stated for a land-use project

Baseline

No baseline method or reassessment date found

Safeguards

No FPIC, grievance mechanism, or safeguards documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents