Skip to main content
CCWaste handling and disposalPanamaACM0001

Cerro Patacón Landfill Gas Usage

ECO-92 ↗

#80of 189 in Methane#4of 11 in Panama#55of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)#75of 159 in ACM0001

4.8/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The Cerro Patacón landfill gas project in Panama has VVB-confirmed additionality and a conservative delivery profile (approximately 78% of pro-rata ex-ante expectation), but is undermined by an extensive list of material findings including monitoring deviations, PDD formula and capacity errors, and a 0% leakage deduction that the monitoring report itself states will not be monitored. The project relies on a project-specific modeled baseline and a methodological deviation for quantification, which together limit confidence in the integrity of the credit claims.

Red Flags

  • Monitoring report explicitly states leakage will not be monitored, yet the verification report classifies the 0% leakage deduction as 'quantified' — an internal inconsistency that weakens the leakage treatment
  • Continuous gas volume and methane fraction monitoring was not performed; quantification relied on a methodological deviation using net electricity generation, with corrective action to install proper equipment only estimated for end of 2022
  • PDD contained multiple formula errors (FCH4,PJ,y calculation), incorrect installed capacity (7.2 MW vs. verified 8.151 MW), and waste composition data inconsistent with the 2013 site study — all flagged as material findings by the VVB
  • Calibration delays for energy meters were identified across 2017–2018 and 2018–2020, and calibration certificates for monitoring equipment (other than the energy meter) were not presented

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
45,6372,01543,622
2018
85,42133085,091
2019
104,2913,468100,823
2020
156,98017,716139,264
2021
125,9085,090120,818
Total518,23728,619489,618

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test; capture not legally required

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction called 'quantified' but monitoring report says leakage will not be monitored

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline; reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

FPIC conducted and safeguards mentioned in validation report, but grievance mechanism not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA eligibility and CCP status both not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01MDL ACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents