Skip to main content
VCSavoidanceTürkiye Registry: RegisteredACM0002

Ceyhan 61.7 MW Hydropower Project

VCS-810 ↗

#926of 1935 in Renewable energy#19of 26 in Türkiye#584of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#722of 1287 in ACM0002

5.2/ 10
Integrity
6.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

The Ceyhan 61.7 MW hydropower project is a long-operating avoidance project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no material findings, but its credit record is undermined by eleven cross-document contradictions, a low extraction confidence rating, and a verified emission reduction figure that exceeds the pro-rata ex-ante expectation by roughly 288%. The project's fundamental design (grid-displacement hydropower) carries low inherent permanence and leakage risk, yet documentation gaps and inconsistent baseline/EF values limit confidence in the exact credit quantity.

Red Flags

  • Eleven contradictions across documents, including a 2.4× discrepancy in verified ER (681,250 in the monitoring report vs 287,566 in the verification report) and a 25% grid emission factor gap (0.4929 in the PDD vs 0.615 in the monitoring report)
  • Verified ER of 681,250 tCO₂e for the 2018–2020 monitoring period is approximately 288% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation (~236,679 tCO₂e), raising over-crediting concerns even accounting for hydrological variability
  • Baseline method is stated as 'project' in the verification report but 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report, creating ambiguity about the baseline construction
  • Two corrective actions remain open: the EIA Not Required Certificate was not provided to the DOE and 2009 stakeholder meeting records were not submitted
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
48,67148,6710
2011
130,427130,4270
2012
93,29093,2900
2013
6146140
2016
1,1721,1720
2020
60,00037,07822,922
Total334,174311,25222,922

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction, quantified justification

Baseline

Method contradicted across documents

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism documented

Double-claim

CORSIA-ineligible, no dual-issuance evidence

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents