Ceyhan 61.7 MW Hydropower Project
#926of 1935 in Renewable energy#19of 26 in Türkiye#584of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#722of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Ceyhan 61.7 MW hydropower project is a long-operating avoidance project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no material findings, but its credit record is undermined by eleven cross-document contradictions, a low extraction confidence rating, and a verified emission reduction figure that exceeds the pro-rata ex-ante expectation by roughly 288%. The project's fundamental design (grid-displacement hydropower) carries low inherent permanence and leakage risk, yet documentation gaps and inconsistent baseline/EF values limit confidence in the exact credit quantity.
Red Flags
- Eleven contradictions across documents, including a 2.4× discrepancy in verified ER (681,250 in the monitoring report vs 287,566 in the verification report) and a 25% grid emission factor gap (0.4929 in the PDD vs 0.615 in the monitoring report)
- Verified ER of 681,250 tCO₂e for the 2018–2020 monitoring period is approximately 288% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation (~236,679 tCO₂e), raising over-crediting concerns even accounting for hydrological variability
- Baseline method is stated as 'project' in the verification report but 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report, creating ambiguity about the baseline construction
- Two corrective actions remain open: the EIA Not Required Certificate was not provided to the DOE and 2009 stakeholder meeting records were not submitted
- Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 48,671 | 48,671 | 0 | |
| 2011 | 130,427 | 130,427 | 0 | |
| 2012 | 93,290 | 93,290 | 0 | |
| 2013 | 614 | 614 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 1,172 | 1,172 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 60,000 | 37,078 | 22,922 | |
| Total | 334,174 | 311,252 | 22,922 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction, quantified justification
Method contradicted across documents
FPIC, grievance mechanism documented
CORSIA-ineligible, no dual-issuance evidence
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →