CGN Dalian Xizhongdao Wind Farm Project
#830of 1935 in Renewable energy#420of 1084 in China#581of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#644of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A CDM wind farm project in China with a single monitoring period showing verified emissions reductions (102,577 tCO₂e) that align closely with the pro-rata PDD expectation. Key gaps include the absence of a stated additionality test type in the extracted record, contradictory leakage justifications between the validation and monitoring reports, and a baseline method discrepancy (project-specific vs. jurisdictional). No reversal events or corrective actions were reported, and the project is an avoidance-type with inherent permanence.
Red Flags
- Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in any extracted document, leaving a core CDM requirement unverified in the available record
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the validation report (2020) deems leakage negligible while the monitoring report (2022) records it as not addressed, with a 0% deduction applied
- Baseline method is characterised as 'project' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the validation report, creating ambiguity about the baseline construction
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 567,400 | 0 | 567,400 | |
| 2023 | 250,640 | 0 | 250,640 | |
| Total | 818,040 | 0 | 818,040 |
Risk Indicators
Test type not stated in extracted record
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, contradictory justification
Method contradicts across documents
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
