China Guangdong Shenzhen Qianwan LNG generation project
#861of 1329 in Industrial#862of 1084 in China#1122of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#14of 19 in AM0029
Audit Analysis
A CDM fossil-fuel-switch project (LNG replacing coal) in Shenzhen with a well-understood emission-reduction mechanism, but the extracted record shows significant gaps in additionality evidence, a major discrepancy between the PDD ex-ante estimate (1.55 MtCO₂e) and the validated/verified figure (220,897 tCO₂e), and a contradiction on baseline method. The two minor PDD formatting findings are low-risk, but the ERR gap and missing additionality documentation materially weaken confidence in the project's integrity and claim safety.
Red Flags
- The PDD ex-ante estimate of 1,546,279 tCO₂e is roughly 7× the validated and verified figure of 220,897 tCO₂e, indicating either a severe over-estimation in the PDD or a scope mismatch that was not reconciled in the validation report.
- Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in any extracted document, leaving the core CDM additionality requirement unverified in the available record.
- Baseline method is reported as 'project-specific' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the validation report — an unresolved contradiction that affects the robustness of the counterfactual.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 493,480 | 0 | 493,480 | |
| 2011 | 618,191 | 0 | 618,191 | |
| 2012 | 143,024 | 0 | 143,024 | |
| Total | 1,254,695 | 0 | 1,254,695 |
Risk Indicators
Test type and VVB confirmation not stated in extracted recor
Avoidance project (fuel switch); no reversal risk
Quantified per monitoring report; specific % not available
Method contradicts across documents; reassessed 2016
Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not detai
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →