Skip to main content
CDMEE own generationChinaACM0004

Chongqing Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. Waste Gas to Electricity Project

CDM-1689 ↗

#489of 1084 in China#666of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#15of 28 in ACM0004

5.2/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM waste-gas-to-electricity project with a solid combined additionality test confirmed by the VVB, but undermined by six material findings (including a corrective action on monitoring-plan compliance), a contradictory baseline method (jurisdictional vs. project-specific), a 0% leakage deduction with inconsistent justification, and conflicting ERR figures across monitoring reports. The project sits under the older CDM standard, so the absence of a buffer pool and CORSIA/CCP designations is expected, but the data-reliability issues lower confidence in the verified credits.

Red Flags

  • Six material findings in the validation report, including CAR #4 requiring the project proponent to revise the monitoring plan for full compliance with the monitoring methodology
  • Baseline method contradicts between documents: the validation report (2008) describes a project-specific baseline while the monitoring report (2011) refers to a jurisdictional baseline
  • Two monitoring reports give materially different claimed ERR figures (212,686 in the 2010 report vs. 57,308 in the 2011 report), creating uncertainty about the true ex-ante expectation
  • Leakage deduction is 0% yet the justification is inconsistent: the validation report deems leakage negligible while the monitoring report labels it 'quantified'
  • Two corrective actions remain open, including a requirement to revise and improve project design documents based on expert opinions

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
35,740035,740
2010
83,247083,247
2011
212,5590212,559
2012
57,308057,308
Total388,8540388,854

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

no reversal data

Leakage

0% deduction, inconsistent justification

Baseline

Method contradicts across documents

Safeguards

Mentioned but not detailed

Double-claim

CCP/CORSIA status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-27ACM0004

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents