Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredVCSManufacturing industries; Metal productionUnited StatesRegistry: RegisteredAM0065

Conversion of SF6 To An Alternative Cover Gas In Magnesium Production In Eaton Rapids, MI and Strathroy, ON

Developer: Magnesium Products of America (also denoted as Meridian Magnesium Products of America or MPA)

VCS-618 ↗

#31of 1794 in United States#94of 1612 in Verra (VCS)

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.1 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Conversion of SF6 To An Alternative Cover Gas In Magnesium Production In Eaton Rapids, MI and Strathroy, ON (United States) replaces SF6 with an alternative cover gas in magnesium production (sF6 abatement technology (Novec-612)) under AM0065 v2.1; registry status Registered (VCS), 2,669,633 credits issued (vintages 2008–2022). The documents name Det Norske Veritas Certification AS as validation body and Det Norske Veritas Certification AS (2010-01-01 – 2010-12-31), First Environment, Inc (2017-11-01 – 2018-12-31, 2019-01-01 – 2019-12-31, 2020-01-01 – 2020-12-31, 2021-01-01 – 2021-12-31), Agri-Waste Technology, Inc (2022-01-01 – 2023-12-31) as verification bodies. The documents estimate 240,000 tCO2e per year. The latest verification report (01-January-2022 – 31-December-2023) verifies 222,721 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 68 registry documents (59 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMAM0065

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
50,73250,7320
2009
132,143132,1430
2010
199,913199,9130
2011
207,542207,5420
2012
244,098244,0980
2013
265,135265,1350
2014
285,895285,8950
2015
315,296315,2951
2016
328,436328,4360
2017
188,675188,6750
2018
88,50588,5050
2019
131,848131,8480
2020
114,492114,4920
2021
89,54889,5480
2022
27,37527,3750
Total2,669,6332,669,6321

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2007–2008AM0065 v1.0since replaced by v2.1

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2009AM0065 v1.0since replaced by v2.1

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2010AM0065 v2.1current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2011AM0065the documents for this period state different versions (v1.0, v2.1)

    monitoring report + verification report

  5. 2012AM0065the documents for this period state different versions (v1.0, v2.1)

    monitoring report + verification report

  6. 2013–2014AM0065 v1.0since replaced by v2.1

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2014–2015AM0065 v1.0since replaced by v2.1

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2016AM0065 v1.0since replaced by v2.1

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2017AM0065 v2.1current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2017–2018AM0065 v2.1current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  11. 2019AM0065 v2.1current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  12. 2020AM0065 v2.1current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  13. 2021AM0065 v2.1current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  14. 2022–2023AM0065 v2.1current version

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • AM0065: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+9)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAM0065 v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →