Skip to main content
CDMLandfill gasBrazilACM0001

CTL Landfill Gas Project

CDM-5947 ↗

#134of 189 in Methane#149of 211 in Brazil#1264of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#116of 159 in ACM0001

4.2/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
3.3
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The CTL Landfill Gas Project in Brazil has a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and a structured monitoring framework, but is undermined by nine material findings (including baseline calculation errors), a 0% leakage deduction with contradictory justifications across documents, and the absence of any buffer pool or permanence safeguard data. Multiple corrective actions remain open, and the verified ERR figure is not available, making it impossible to confirm actual delivery against the ex-ante estimate.

Red Flags

  • Nine material findings in the verification report, including incorrect application of FCH4 case (Case 4 used instead of Case 3 with 20% default MDBL), use of half-year methane data, and an outdated grid emission factor (2017 instead of 2018), all of which distort the baseline and reduction estimates.
  • Leakage deduction of 0% with the monitoring report stating leakage was 'not addressed' while the validation report claims it was 'deemed negligible' — a direct contradiction that leaves the 0% figure unsupported.
  • No buffer pool percentage or permanence safeguard is stated in any available document for a landfill gas project where biological degradation and flare failure create genuine reversal risk.
  • Total ERR claimed of 534,503 tCO2e (monitoring report, 9-month period) versus 1,117,018 tCO2e (validation report) cannot be reconciled without knowing the exact scope of each figure, and the verified ERR is not reported.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2014
113,8650113,865
2015
264,2990264,299
2018
2,689,91302,689,913
2019
648,8100648,810
2020
1,076,57101,076,571
2021
539,0550539,055
Total5,332,51305,332,513

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction, justification contradictory

Baseline

Project-specific, modeled, multiple CARs

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned, benefit sharing described, FPIC not st

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-27ACM0001 ver. 19

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents