Skip to main content
CDMHydroVietnamACM0002

DakRTih Hydropower Project, Vietnam

CDM-4537 ↗

#1540of 1935 in Renewable energy#75of 80 in Vietnam#1326of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1175of 1287 in ACM0002

4.1/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The DakRTih Hydropower Project has a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and a reputable verification body, but is undermined by six material findings requiring corrective action, a seven-fold discrepancy between the ex-ante and monitoring-period ERR figures, contradictory baseline and leakage treatments across documents, and the absence of any verified ERR figure. The project's compliance posture is weak, and the over-crediting risk is significant.

Red Flags

  • Six material findings (CARs) in the monitoring report, including incorrect methodology version (v11 vs v19), missing surface water permit, non-compliance with EB 66 Annex 47, and an outdated grid emission factor
  • The monitoring report claims 1,371,906 tCO₂e for a 2.33-year period versus an ex-ante estimate of 555,166 tCO₂e for the full 7-year crediting period — a pro-rata over-delivery of roughly 740%, which is extreme even for a flow-variable hydro project
  • Leakage deduction is 0% with contradictory justifications: the validation report (2019) deems it negligible, while the monitoring report (2022) states it was not addressed
  • Baseline method is described as 'project-specific' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the PDD, creating ambiguity about the reference case
  • No verified ERR figure is available in the extracted record; only the claimed figure from the monitoring report is present

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
240,9900240,990
2014
422,2730422,273
2017
1,175,79401,175,794
2022
972,8780972,878
2023
1,371,90601,371,906
Total4,183,84104,183,841

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

No reversal data

Leakage

0% deduction; justification contradictory across docs

Baseline

Method contradicts between PDD and monitoring report; grid E

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; no FPIC or grievan

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-27ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents