Dona Juana landfill gas-to-energy project
#138of 189 in Methane#107of 124 in Colombia#1293of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#120of 159 in ACM0001
Audit Analysis
The Doña Juana landfill gas-to-energy project has a confirmed investment-test additionality and a VVB-verified baseline, but is undermined by a 45% grid emission factor discrepancy between the PDD and monitoring report, 13 material findings with 17 corrective actions, and a complete absence of safeguards documentation in the monitoring phase. The project's data reliability is further weakened by the lack of a verified ERR figure and contradictory leakage treatment across documents.
Red Flags
- Grid emission factor differs by 45% between the PDD (0.4972, Dec 2018) and the monitoring report (0.2745, Nov 2020), raising serious over-crediting risk if the higher value was used in earlier credit issuances
- 13 material findings and 17 corrective actions identified during validation/verification, including incorrect baseline calculation (RCP tool not applied), flawed grid EF methodology, and inadequate monitoring QA/QC for gas analyzers and flare operation
- Safeguards are mentioned in the validation report (Mar 2017) but entirely absent from the monitoring report (Nov 2017); FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is in place
- Total verified ERR is not available in the extracted record, preventing independent confirmation of claimed credits (793,840 tCO₂e)
- Leakage treatment is contradictory: the validation report (2017) states leakage was not addressed, while the monitoring report (2020) claims it was quantified, yet the deduction remains 0%
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 505,097 | 0 | 505,097 | |
| 2012 | 980,262 | 0 | 980,262 | |
| 2013 | 351,516 | 0 | 351,516 | |
| 2014 | 1,455,308 | 0 | 1,455,308 | |
| 2015 | 771,670 | 0 | 771,670 | |
| 2016 | 287,397 | 0 | 287,397 | |
| 2017 | 464,906 | 0 | 464,906 | |
| 2020 | 511,964 | 0 | 511,964 | |
| Total | 5,328,120 | 0 | 5,328,120 |
Risk Indicators
Investment test, VVB-verified
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction, contradictory justification
Project-specific, modeled, EF discrepancy
No FPIC, no grievance mechanism
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →