Skip to main content
CDMLandfill gasColombiaACM0001

Dona Juana landfill gas-to-energy project

CDM-2554 ↗

#138of 189 in Methane#107of 124 in Colombia#1293of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#120of 159 in ACM0001

4.2/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The Doña Juana landfill gas-to-energy project has a confirmed investment-test additionality and a VVB-verified baseline, but is undermined by a 45% grid emission factor discrepancy between the PDD and monitoring report, 13 material findings with 17 corrective actions, and a complete absence of safeguards documentation in the monitoring phase. The project's data reliability is further weakened by the lack of a verified ERR figure and contradictory leakage treatment across documents.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor differs by 45% between the PDD (0.4972, Dec 2018) and the monitoring report (0.2745, Nov 2020), raising serious over-crediting risk if the higher value was used in earlier credit issuances
  • 13 material findings and 17 corrective actions identified during validation/verification, including incorrect baseline calculation (RCP tool not applied), flawed grid EF methodology, and inadequate monitoring QA/QC for gas analyzers and flare operation
  • Safeguards are mentioned in the validation report (Mar 2017) but entirely absent from the monitoring report (Nov 2017); FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is in place
  • Total verified ERR is not available in the extracted record, preventing independent confirmation of claimed credits (793,840 tCO₂e)
  • Leakage treatment is contradictory: the validation report (2017) states leakage was not addressed, while the monitoring report (2020) claims it was quantified, yet the deduction remains 0%

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
505,0970505,097
2012
980,2620980,262
2013
351,5160351,516
2014
1,455,30801,455,308
2015
771,6700771,670
2016
287,3970287,397
2017
464,9060464,906
2020
511,9640511,964
Total5,328,12005,328,120

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test, VVB-verified

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction, contradictory justification

Baseline

Project-specific, modeled, EF discrepancy

Safeguards

No FPIC, no grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-28ACM0001 ver. 17

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents