Dry Burney
#28of 69 in REDD+#41of 115 in United States#7of 32 in Climate Action Reserve (CAR)
Audit Analysis
The Dry Burney project demonstrates strong permanence and leakage controls through a substantial buffer pool contribution and quantified deduction practices. However, significant gaps in additionality verification, baseline reassessment documentation, and MRV transparency limit overall confidence. Improved document readability and clearer reporting on verifier activities would substantially strengthen the project's credibility.
Red Flags
- Missing additionality verification and test type details
- Low extraction confidence and unknown document metadata
- Project-specific baseline without recorded reassessment date
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
No assessment documented
Buffer pool active, no reversals
Quantified 20% deduction
Project-specific, reassessment missing
Safeguards not documented
Eligibility status unknown
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
