Efficient Cookstoves in Bahia II - Santo Amaro
GS-25 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1028
#22of 202 in Industrial#12of 104 in Brazil#86of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard cookstove project in Bahia, Brazil, with a combined additionality test and local-field FNRB, but significant gaps in permanence safeguards (no buffer pool), a thin leakage justification, and a project-specific baseline with no recorded reassessment. The project consistently under-delivered relative to PDD expectations (50–68% of projected reductions), which is conservative for claim safety but signals weak planning and monitoring. Multiple data contradictions across monitoring reports are largely explainable by different reporting periods, but the overall evidence base shows moderate reliability concerns.
Red Flags
- No buffer pool or permanence safeguard is stated in any available document, leaving no safety margin against stove failure or disuse
- Leakage deduction is 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' justification, which is thin for a project where displaced fuel purchases or additional wood harvesting are plausible
- Usage rate assumed in the PDD (0.97) is 13 percentage points higher than the verified rate (0.84), indicating optimistic baseline assumptions
- Actual emissions reductions were only 50% of expected for the monitoring period and 68% of the expected average annual ER, reflecting a major gap between planned and delivered stoves (2,150 vs 3,300)
- Four corrective actions remain open, including a required physical site visit and Water Boiling Test results for the next verification cycle
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2,053 | 2,012 | 41 | |
| 2015 | 1,789 | 1,754 | 35 | |
| 2016 | 3,050 | 2,991 | 59 | |
| 2017 | 5,715 | 5,715 | 0 | |
| 2018 | 6,448 | 6,448 | 0 | |
| 2019 | 5,921 | 5,921 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 4,354 | 4,354 | 0 | |
| Total | 29,330 | 29,195 | 135 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test present; VVB confirmation not explicitly state
No buffer pool documented; usage rates declining for older s
0% deduction with thin 'deemed negligible' justification
Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date recorded
Grievance mechanism and safeguards mentioned; FPIC not state
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →