Eficiencia energética por Control Operacional en la Refinería de Cartagena
#166of 1329 in Industrial#18of 124 in Colombia#18of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)#3of 12 in AMS-II.D
Audit Analysis
An energy-efficiency project at the Cartagena Refinery verified under the Colombian CerCarbono registry using AMS-II.D methodology. The VVB confirmed additionality via a combined test and the project delivered 131% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, but significant MRV errors (a 21.92% baseline underestimation and inclusion of non-eligible combustion-efficiency improvements) were identified and corrected during verification. Safeguards documentation is weak, with no FPIC, no grievance mechanism per the verification report, and permanence/reversal risk left unaddressed.
Red Flags
- Material finding: 21.92% underestimation of emission reductions for Unit U-044 due to a reference error in the 2021 baseline, corrected in the monitoring report
- Material finding: combustion-efficiency improvements were incorrectly included in emission reduction calculations, which is not acceptable under AMS-II.D; corrected to exclude non-eligible activities
- Permanence and reversal risk explicitly not addressed (Section 5.2.3 states it does not apply to the PMCC) and no buffer pool is documented
- Grid emission factor contradiction within the same monitoring report: 0.3316 vs 0.0582 tCO2/kWh, a factor-of-5.7 discrepancy
- No FPIC conducted and no grievance mechanism per the verification report, despite the PDD claiming otherwise
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 34,206 | 0 | 34,206 | |
| 2021 | 61,905 | 0 | 61,905 | |
| Total | 96,111 | 0 | 96,111 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Not addressed
0% deduction, quantified justification
Project-specific, modeled, no reassessment date
No FPIC, no grievance mechanism per VVB
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →