EJIDO LAS MILPAS Y ANEXOS
Assessment
Re-analysis queued
This project's registry data changed or new documents were published after the last analysis. The previous rating has been withdrawn — it no longer reflects the current evidence — and will reappear here once the re-analysis completes.
Evidence
Eligibility & market
What can you claim with this credit?
Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).
Airlines (CORSIA)
Eligible — first phase 2024–2026
Airlines can use these credits for their international CORSIA obligations.
Source: registry label
Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)
CCP-labelled credits
The registry marks these credits with the Core Carbon Principles label of the Integrity Council.
Source: registry label
Removal or reduction
Carbon removal
Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.
Source: registry label
Paris Agreement (Article 6)
No Article 6 authorization
No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.
Source: registry label
Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.
Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 14,054 | 0 | 14,054 | |
| 2022 | 69,642 | 0 | 69,642 | |
| 2023 | 59,947 | 0 | 59,947 | |
| 2024 | 48,370 | 0 | 48,370 | |
| 2025 | 11,115 | 0 | 11,115 | |
| Total | 203,128 | 0 | 203,128 |
Where to buy
Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
Profile & governance
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Contest this rating
Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.
Contest this rating →