El Platanal Hydropower Plant
#840of 1935 in Renewable energy#6of 24 in Peru#591of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#653of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
El Platanal is a small-scale hydro project in Peru displacing grid electricity, with a straightforward avoidance mechanism and inherently low reversal risk. However, the project carries a significant documentation burden: seven corrective actions were raised during verification, the baseline method is contradicted between the validation and monitoring reports (jurisdictional vs. project-specific), and the leakage treatment is inconsistent across documents. The ERR figures also show a notable discrepancy between the initial validation estimate and the later monitoring report, introducing uncertainty about the robustness of the credit claim.
Red Flags
- Seven corrective actions (CARs) were required during verification, including outdated methodology version, incorrect monitoring frequencies for two parameters, and a CO2 emission factor adjustment for specific grid units — indicating multiple methodology-compliance gaps in the original documentation.
- The baseline method is stated as 'jurisdictional' in the 2017 validation report but 'project' in the 2023 monitoring report, a fundamental contradiction that undermines confidence in the baseline calculation.
- Leakage treatment is inconsistent: the 2017 validation report deems leakage negligible, while the 2023 monitoring report records it as 'not addressed,' with a 0% deduction in both cases.
- The total ERR claimed in the 2023 monitoring report (1,318,705 tCO2e) is more than three times the figure in the 2017 validation report (413,475 tCO2e), and the verified figure matches the lower initial estimate exactly, raising questions about whether the verified number was independently recalculated.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 545,090 | 0 | 545,090 | |
| 2012 | 733,222 | 0 | 733,222 | |
| 2013 | 260,807 | 0 | 260,807 | |
| 2014 | 602,142 | 0 | 602,142 | |
| Total | 2,141,261 | 0 | 2,141,261 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test applied; VVB sign-off not confirmed in extract
Hydro avoidance project; no inherent reversal risk
0% deduction; justification inconsistent (negligible vs. not
Contradicted: jurisdictional (2017) vs. project (2023); grid
FPIC conducted; grievance mechanism in place; safeguards doc
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →