Skip to main content
CDMEE IndustryIndiaAMS-II.D

Energy efficiency improvement of the existing Frame V Gas Turbine by steam injection and change of drive (from steam to electricity) of Ammonia cooling water pumps at NFCL

CDM-1893 ↗

#1049of 1329 in Industrial#841of 975 in India#1296of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#10of 12 in AMS-II.D

4.2/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM energy-efficiency project at an Indian ammonia plant with a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and a measured baseline, but undermined by a ten-fold discrepancy in claimed emissions reductions between the PDD and the validation report, four corrective actions required before approval, and a near-total absence of monitoring or verification data. The project's fundamental design is sound under a well-established methodology, yet the data-quality gaps and contradictions significantly erode confidence in the credit volume.

Red Flags

  • The PDD states a total ERR of 89,270 tCO2e while the validation report (the authoritative VVB document) states 8,927 tCO2e — a factor-of-ten discrepancy that raises serious questions about data integrity and potential over-crediting if the PDD figure was used in any downstream calculation.
  • Four corrective actions were required during validation, including recalculation of baseline emissions using the lowest Station Heat Rate from the last three years and revision of the crediting-period start date, indicating the initial submission contained material errors.
  • No monitoring reports, verification reports, or verified ERR figures are present in the extracted record, making it impossible to confirm whether the project actually delivered the claimed reductions over its 2008–2018 crediting period.
  • Leakage treatment is inconsistent: the validation report characterises leakage as 'deemed negligible' (0% deduction) while an appendix describes it as 'quantified,' creating ambiguity about whether a quantitative assessment was actually performed.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, justification contradicted in appendix

Baseline

Project-specific measured baseline, no reassessment data

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned, no FPIC or grievan

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29AMS-II.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents