Skip to main content
GSOtherIraqGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Energy for Mam Rashan

GS-1685 ↗ · current registry ID: GS6460

#1142of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.7/ 10
Integrity
5.2
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.8
Documentation
3.8

Audit Analysis

Energy for Mam Rashan is a micro-scale renewable electrification project in Iraq with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a reasonable grid emission factor baseline. However, the project carries significant operational risk signals: seven material findings, multiple corrective action requests, no buffer pool, unaddressed reversal risk, and seven inter-document contradictions that undermine data reliability. The low extraction confidence and absence of a verified ERR figure further limit confidence in the claimed 730 tCO₂e for the first monitoring period.

Red Flags

  • Seven material findings and at least eleven corrective action requests reported in the 2026 verification report, including repeated plant maintenance interruptions and supply disruptions that reduced emission reductions below estimates
  • No buffer pool percentage stated and reversal events explicitly 'not addressed' in the verification report, leaving permanence risk unmitigated
  • Seven contradictions across documents, including conflicting leakage justifications ('deemed negligible' vs 'quantified'), conflicting additionality test types (investment vs combined), and conflicting safeguards documentation
  • Minimum extraction confidence rated 'low', indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the entire evidence base
  • Total ERR verified figure is not stated in the extracted record; only the claimed 730 tCO₂e from the monitoring report is available, preventing independent verification of the credit quantity

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
44044
2019
1590159
2020
1110111
2021
581314267
2022
4510451
2023
6050605
2024
6090609
Total2,5603142,246

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

reversals not addressed

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' but contradicts earlier 'quantified'

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; grid EF stated but no fnrb method

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CCP not mentioned; CORSIA eligibility not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents