CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

No public grade applies yet

EOS HFC 310

Standard
ACR
Methodology
ACR-HFC-RECLAIMED (ACR)
Registry
ACR-310 ↗ · Crediting ended
Country
ILLINOIS, US
Credit type
Industrial Process Emissions
Developer
EOS Climate Inc
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives EOS HFC 310 (ACR-310) no number (No public grade applies yet): CarbonMeld read its documents, but its type of project does not yet have a public grade that applies to it on both additionality and quantification. The absence of a number says nothing about the project's quality.

Crediting ended

The crediting period has ended. Credits already issued exist; no new ones will be issued unless the crediting period is renewed.

American Carbon Registry: “COMPLETED”

Assessment

Document-based rating

No public grade applies yet

No public source has yet given this type of project grades on both additionality and quantification that apply here. CarbonMeld read this project's documents. The analysis is below. The page can receive a number once a public grade of its type of project applies on both additionality and quantification. The absence of a number says nothing about the project's quality.

Evidence coverage: medium

Methodology v3 · documents read on 18 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: no public grade of this type of project applies
  • Quantification: no public grade of this type of project applies
  • Claim safety: no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that lower a dimension or the rating as a whole: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted by the method

  • The ICVCM's decision: the ICVCM is still assessing this methodology
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read
  • Additionality: CCQI's tool has no type of project for this activity
  • Quantification: the documents read do not name the project's main methodology, so no CCQI grade of it applies

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · About the System

How this analysis was made

Standard
American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Methodology
Certified Reclaimed HFC Refrigerants, Propellants, and Fire Suppressants (per the registry) How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 18 Oct 2026

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project credit type

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
8,4688,348120
Total8,4688,348120

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Report an error on this page

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Report an error on this page

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Report an error on this page →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). EOS HFC 310 (ACR-310): CarbonMeld document-based analysis, methodology v3, documents read on 18 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/eos-hfc-310/.

The citation names the analysis by its methodology version and the day the documents were read; the page gives no number.

Unlock the full analysis

Every rule that applies to the project, each with its fact, its quote, its source and, where it has them, its points; the detail and quotes of the negative facts; and 3 registry documents (3 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.