ESTRE Itapevi Landfill Gas Project (EILGP)
#106of 189 in Methane#128of 211 in Brazil#1091of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#97of 159 in ACM0001
Audit Analysis
The ESTRE Itapevi Landfill Gas Project is a CDM-registered methane capture project in Brazil with a combined additionality test and a project-specific modeled baseline reassessed in 2022. However, significant data gaps persist: no monitoring reports or verified ERR figures are available, the leakage justification is contradictory between the PDD and validation report, and the claimed ERR differs by a factor of eight between the two documents. The project's fundamental design is sound for a landfill gas avoidance project, but the evidentiary record is thin and the contradictions undermine confidence in the reported figures.
Red Flags
- Claimed ERR differs by a factor of ~8 between the validation report (128,419 tCO2e) and the PDD (1,027,351 tCO2e); while this may reflect a single crediting period versus full project lifetime, the discrepancy is not explicitly reconciled in the available documents.
- Grid emission factor is 0.3004 in the validation report but 0.5985 in the PDD — a 2× difference that materially affects the baseline calculation.
- Leakage justification is stated as 'quantified' in the PDD but 'not addressed' in the validation report, leaving the basis for the 0% deduction unclear.
- No monitoring reports or verified ERR figures are available in the extracted record, making it impossible to assess actual delivery against claims.
- Additionality verification by the VVB is not explicitly confirmed in the available documents despite a combined test being described.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 29,847 | 0 | 29,847 | |
| 2009 | 46,644 | 0 | 46,644 | |
| 2011 | 24,956 | 0 | 24,956 | |
| 2012 | 173,989 | 0 | 173,989 | |
| 2013 | 81,686 | 0 | 81,686 | |
| 2021 | 102,613 | 0 | 102,613 | |
| Total | 459,735 | 0 | 459,735 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test described but VVB confirmation not explicit
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction reasonable but justification contradictory acro
Project-specific modeled baseline, reassessed 2022, grid EF
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CORSIA and CCP status both not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →