Skip to main content
CDMHydroChinaACM0002

Gansu Yongchang County Donghewan Cascaded Hydropower Project

CDM-2844 ↗

#1487of 1935 in Renewable energy#924of 1084 in China#1239of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1133of 1287 in ACM0002

4.3/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM small-scale hydropower project in Gansu, China, verified by Applus+LGAI over a 7-year crediting period (2017–2024), with 413,644 tCO₂e credits issued. The project is undermined by significant contradictions between the validation and monitoring reports on the grid emission factor (a factor-of-two discrepancy), the baseline method, and the leakage justification, raising material over-crediting risk. Additionality verification, permanence safeguards, and grievance mechanisms are not explicitly documented in the available record.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor differs by a factor of two between the validation report (0.47355 tCO₂/MWh) and the monitoring report (0.9457 tCO₂/MWh), directly affecting the magnitude of all issued credits
  • Baseline method is described as 'jurisdictional' in the validation report but 'project-specific' in the monitoring report, creating ambiguity about the robustness of the baseline
  • Leakage justification is inconsistent: the validation report states leakage was 'deemed negligible' while the monitoring report states it was 'quantified', yet both result in a 0% deduction
  • Additionality test type and VVB confirmation of additionality are not stated in any available document
  • No buffer pool, reversal-event tracking, or permanence risk mitigation is documented for a project whose physical asset (dam) is subject to failure or drought risk

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
39,831039,831
2012
87,126087,126
2013
107,2390107,239
Total234,1960234,196

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Test type and VVB confirmation not stated in available docum

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction with inconsistent justification across document

Baseline

Method and grid EF contradict between validation and monitor

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned, but FPIC and griev

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents