Generation of Electrical Energy in SOL Coqueria by Process Heat Recovery
#179of 1329 in Industrial#32of 211 in Brazil#417of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#7of 28 in ACM0012
Audit Analysis
A CDM heat-recovery CHP project in Brazil with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a thorough validation process (eight corrective actions resolved), but significant gaps in verified delivery data, a thin leakage justification, and a baseline-method contradiction between the validation report and the monitoring report. The fixed 2009 grid emission factor and absence of a verified ERR figure limit confidence in the claimed 2.08 MtCO2e over the 10-year crediting period.
Red Flags
- Baseline method is stated as 'jurisdictional' in the 2018 monitoring report but 'project-specific' in the 2012 validation report — an unresolved contradiction that affects the credibility of the counterfactual.
- Grid emission factor is fixed at the 2009 value (0.3112 tCO2/MWh) for the entire 10-year crediting period with no update mechanism, risking over-crediting as the Brazilian grid decarbonises.
- No verified ERR figure is available in the extracted record, so actual delivery against the 2,079,298 tCO2e claim cannot be confirmed.
- Leakage is set at 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' label; the 2012 validation report does not address leakage at all, and no quantitative analysis is provided in the monitoring report.
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-confirmed
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deemed negligible, no quantitative analysis
Method contradictory across documents
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →