Skip to main content
CDMMethane avoidanceEthiopiaAM0080

GHG Emissions Reduction through Modjo Common Effluent Treatment Plant

CDM-10265 ↗

#33of 36 in Ethiopia#1443of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#6of 6 in AM0080

3.3/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

This CDM methane-avoidance project in Ethiopia has a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment but is undermined by 23 material findings and an equal number of corrective actions identified in the validation report, including the absence of a documented investment analysis and multiple undemonstrated applicability conditions. No verified monitoring data, buffer pool, or reversal-event record is available, and five contradictions between the PDD and validation report—including a tenfold discrepancy in the claimed ERR—raise serious data-reliability concerns. The project's documentation is further weakened by low extraction confidence and the absence of any monitoring or verification reports in the extracted record.

Red Flags

  • 23 material findings in the validation report, including the mandatory investment analysis step not being documented in the PDD and multiple applicability conditions (biogas usage, lagoon depth/residence time, W11 and E2 alternatives) not demonstrated
  • Tenfold discrepancy in total ERR between the PDD (1,426,020) and the validation report (142,602), likely a typographical error but unexplained in the record
  • No verified monitoring data, buffer pool, or reversal-event record found in any available document
  • Five contradictions between the PDD and validation report across leakage justification, energy source, additionality test type, ERR figure, and crediting period
  • Grid emission factor dated 2007 with no evidence of update or reassessment during the 2019–2028 crediting period

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but 23 material findings include missing inves

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justifications across docume

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline, 2007 grid EF, no reassess

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but no FPIC or grievance mechanism docu

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29AM0080

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents