CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

Greater New Bedford LFG

Standard
ACR
Registry
ACR-113 ↗ · Crediting ended
Country
MASSACHUSETTS, United States
Credit type
Landfill Gas Capture & Combustion
Developer
Commonwealth Resource Management Corporation
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Greater New Bedford LFG (ACR-113) 4.8 out of 10 (Low rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 29 Oct 2026. The analysis read 7 of the 7 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Crediting ended

The crediting period has ended. Credits already issued exist; no new ones will be issued unless the crediting period is renewed.

American Carbon Registry: “COMPLETED”

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

010203 Document-based rating 4.8 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

4.8/10

Low rating (3.5 to 4.9)

Evidence coverage: medium

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. Additionality and quantification start from a public grade; permanence starts at 5.0, the neutral point, where none applies, and claim safety always does.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 29 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project
  • Quantification: CCQI's score for this type of project
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that lowered the number: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted in the number

  • The ICVCM's decision: it depends on the methodology's version, and the documents read do not show which version applies
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 29 Oct 2026

evidence: 7/7 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Methodology
Monitoring, Reporting and Verification Protocol for Landfill Gas Combustion (per the registry) No methodology-specific rules: the general rules apply. Read the general rules
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 29 Oct 2026 · 7/7 registry documents read

Analysis

Greater New Bedford LFG (MASSACHUSETTS, US) destroys or beneficially uses landfill gas at a U.S. landfill not required to do so by regulation (active landfill gas collection system consisting of lateral and vertical landfill gas extraction wells, header pipes connecting the wells, and a flare to combust the landfill gas... The generating facility... where landfill gas is converted to electrical power via combustion in four Caterpillar 3516 gas engine generator sets) under Monitoring, Reporting and Verification Protocol for Landfill Gas Combustion (per the registry); registry status Crediting ended (ACR), 713,162 credits issued (vintages 2003–2008). The documents name First Environment, Inc as validation / verification body. The latest verification read with an amount (2007-01-01 – 2007-06-30) verifies 61,157 tCO2e. A verification report is in the record; no monitoring report is among the documents read.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved by ICVCMACR Landfill Gas Destruction

    The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Nov 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2003
117,94517,84899,345
2004
113,15878,0000
2005
112,30684,3060
2006
119,99600
2007
127,17824348,347
2008
122,57925,21997,360
Total713,162205,616245,052

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Greater New Bedford LFG (ACR-113): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 29 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/greater-new-bedford-lfg/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 7 registry documents (7 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.