Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticNigeriaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS10789 VPA66: Efficient and Clean Cooking for households in Nigeria

GS-3686 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11741

#823of 1329 in Industrial#51of 79 in Nigeria#1222of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.6/ 10
Integrity
4.8
Transparency
4.7
Claim Safety
4.3
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard cookstove project in Nigeria with confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but undermined by an unusually high volume of material findings (over 40), contradictory leakage and fNRB values across documents, and a 0% leakage deduction that conflicts with the monitoring report's 5% figure. The project delivered roughly 117% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the monitoring period, so over-crediting is not the primary risk; rather, the risk lies in baseline robustness, end-user awareness gaps, and documentation inconsistencies that weaken confidence in the underlying assumptions.

Red Flags

  • Over 40 material findings and 30+ corrective actions identified by the VVB, including baseline fuel-type disputes (end-users reported charcoal use not captured in the baseline), stove-stacking ambiguity, and multiple SDG calculation errors
  • Leakage deduction of 0% ('deemed negligible') in the verification report directly contradicts the monitoring report's 5% quantified deduction — the more conservative figure was not carried through
  • fNRB value dropped from 0.9627 (local field method, 2024 verification) to 0.8497 (national default, 2025 verification), a ~12% decrease that substantially increases claimed fuel savings without a clear methodological justification in the extracted record
  • Crediting period is inconsistent across documents: the monitoring report states 2023-02-12 to 2028-02-11, while the more recent validation report states 2024-10-02 to 2029-10-01, creating uncertainty about which period the ex-ante estimate of 358,068 tCO2e applies to
  • End-users reported lack of awareness on stove functionality and fuel type, raising doubts about whether the assumed 85% usage rate and fuel-switching assumptions are realistic in practice

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2023
58,796058,796
2024
11,104011,104
Total69,900069,900

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

no reversals but end-user awareness gaps

Leakage

0% deduction contradicted by 5% in monitoring report

Baseline

Project-specific; fuel type disputed; reassessed 2025

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents