GS11677 GS11902 Malawi Biomass Energy Conservation Programme CPA 17
GS-3945 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11917
#760of 1329 in Industrial#54of 92 in Malawi#1148of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#123of 189 in AMS-II.G
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard improved-cookstove project in Malawi with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and no reported reversal events, but undermined by a massive discrepancy between the ex-ante lifetime estimate (~194 ktCO₂e) and the verified annual figure (~1.53 MtCO₂e), a project-specific baseline with no stated reassessment date, and numerous cross-document contradictions in leakage treatment, FNRB method, and usage rates. The project's safeguards and FPIC documentation are adequate, but the ERR over-delivery of roughly 119× the pro-rata expectation raises serious over-crediting concerns.
Red Flags
- Verified ERR of 1,534,828 tCO₂e for a single monitoring year is approximately 119× the pro-rata expectation of ~12,927 tCO₂e derived from the 193,899 tCO₂e lifetime ex-ante estimate over a 15-year crediting period — an extraordinary over-delivery that warrants independent re-verification.
- The verification report is dated 23 August 2023 yet the stated monitoring period is 1 January – 31 December 2024, creating a temporal inconsistency that undermines confidence in which period the verified figure actually covers.
- Leakage treatment is contradictory: the verification report (Aug 2023) describes it as 'quantified' (5% deduction), while a later appendix (Mar 2024) characterises it as 'deemed negligible' — the two positions are mutually inconsistent.
- FNRB method is contradictory: the verification report (Aug 2023) cites a national default (0.81), while an earlier verification report (Feb 2023) cites a local field measurement — the basis of the 0.81 value is unclear.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 39,522 | 39,522 | 0 | |
| 2022 | 24,412 | 0 | 24,412 | |
| Total | 63,934 | 39,522 | 24,412 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
5% quantified but contradicted by 'negligible' in appendix
Project-specific, no reassessment date stated
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status both unstated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →