GS1247 VPA 130 Zoba Anseba Community Safe Water
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB, which supports the project’s core crediting case.
missing Reversal events are not addressed, and no buffer pool allocation is stated in the extracted documents.
Transparency
verified The monitoring period is clearly stated, and the record includes a defined usage monitoring approach based on annual surveys.
missing The verifier name and the claimed versus verified emission reduction totals are not found in the extracted record, limiting auditability.
Claim Safety
verified Leakage is treated with a quantified deduction of 0%, and the record says the leakage treatment is quantified.
inferred The baseline is project-based rather than clearly standardized or recently reassessed, and CORSIA eligibility is not stated.
Documentation
verified The record includes two source documents, a dated monitoring entry, and no corrective actions were required.
missing Extraction confidence is only medium, and several key fields such as the verifier name, buffer pool, and baseline reassessment are missing.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification record supports additionality because it says the VVB confirmed the additionality test, and there were no material findings or corrective actions required. On the weaker side, reversal risk is not addressed, buffer pool coverage is not stated, and the baseline appears to be project-based with no reassessment date found, which reduces confidence in permanence and baseline robustness.
Transparency
The monitoring period is clearly identified as 2022-12-01 to 2023-11-30, and the project uses annual surveys to monitor usage. Transparency is weakened because the verifier name is not found, and the extracted record does not provide total claimed or verified emission reductions, making independent cross-checking harder.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is helped by the quantified leakage treatment, which shows a 0% leakage deduction with a stated justification. However, the baseline method is only described as project-based, the usage rate assumption of 90% differs from the verified 95%, and CORSIA eligibility is not stated, so over-crediting and market-claim risk remain moderate.
Documentation
Documentation quality is mixed: the record includes two documents, a dated monitoring period, and no corrective actions, which is positive. But extraction confidence is only medium, and several important items are missing, including the verifier name, buffer pool percentage, and baseline reassessment timing, so the documentary trail is incomplete.
Overall
There are no contradictions listed in the extracted record, so no document hierarchy conflict needed to be resolved. The main limitation is not inconsistency but missing evidence: several core quality fields are absent or not stated, and the medium extraction confidence suggests at least one source was not fully readable. Because integrity remains above the low-risk threshold, the overall score is not capped by the gate rule, but the missing permanence and documentation details keep the project in the mid-range.
Audit Analysis
The project has some solid quality signals, including VVB-confirmed additionality, FPIC and grievance mechanisms, and no material findings in the available verification record. However, key documentation gaps remain around the verifier identity, buffer pool treatment, baseline reassessment, and reversal handling, which limit confidence in permanence and overall documentation quality.
Project Description
Developer: CO2balance UK ltd Type: Energy Efficiency - Domestic Size: Micro Scale Crediting period: 2020-02-18 → 2027-02-17 Estimated annual credits: 10000 tCO2e SDGs: Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, Goal 13: Climate Action, Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being
Red Flags
- Reversal risk is not addressed in the extracted record, and no buffer pool percentage is stated.
- The verifier name, total verified emissions reductions, and baseline reassessment timing are not found in the available documents.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6,949 | 5,219 | 1,730 | |
| 2021 | 8,184 | 5,549 | 2,635 | |
| 2022 | 7,774 | 5,912 | 1,862 | |
| 2023 | 6,566 | 0 | 6,566 | |
| 2024 | 5,612 | 0 | 5,612 | |
| Total | 35,085 | 16,680 | 18,405 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Provide the verifier name, full verification statement, and the claimed versus verified emission reduction totals for the monitoring period.
- Disclose buffer pool treatment, reversal provisions, and the date and outcome of the most recent baseline reassessment.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed additionality
No buffer pool stated
Quantified 0% leakage deduction
Project baseline, reassessment missing
FPIC and grievance mechanism present
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →