Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticUgandaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1247 VPA 219 Central and Western Uganda Safe Water Project

GS-2369 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7671

#1105of 1329 in Industrial#142of 163 in Uganda#1556of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.1/ 10
Integrity
3.8
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The Central and Western Uganda Safe Water Project has confirmed additionality and a named VVB, but is undermined by severe operational failures (multiple boreholes drying up or going non-functional, repeated water-quality test failures), a 38.5% gap between claimed and verified emissions reductions, and an extensive list of 7 corrective actions and 13 clarification letters raised during verification. The project's data quality and internal consistency are poor, with numerous contradictions across documents on leakage, usage rates, crediting periods, and ERR figures.

Red Flags

  • Multiple boreholes went non-functional or dried up (NAK008 removed from ER calculations; NAK012 non-functional for 138 days in 2023), directly undermining the project's ability to deliver claimed water-safety benefits
  • Water quality tests failed for boreholes NAK007, MAS038, Namaasa, and Molwe across multiple monitoring periods, calling into question the 'safe water' claim
  • Claimed ERR of 7,928 tCO2e versus verified 4,876 tCO2e represents a 38.5% over-claim for the monitoring period
  • Leakage deduction was reduced from 5% in the PDD to 0% in the verification report with only a 'deemed negligible' justification, despite the project type (distributed boreholes) presenting plausible leakage pathways
  • 7 corrective actions and 13 clarification letters were issued during verification, indicating systemic data-quality and reporting problems

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2020
5,0615,0610
2021
5,5704,2411,329
2022
4,42304,423
2023
4,60504,605
2024
5,10205,102
2025
8490849
Total25,6109,30216,308

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

low inherent reversal risk for energy-efficiency type

Leakage

0% deduction with thin 'deemed negligible' justification; PDD had 5%

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, reassessed 2024; not yet due for standard-mandated reassessment

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing all documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents