Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticUgandaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1247 VPA 44 BioLite Improved Stove Programme, Uganda

GS-733 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4271

#373of 1329 in Industrial#38of 163 in Uganda#595of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

5.2/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The BioLite Improved Stove Programme is a long-running Gold Standard VPA (since 2013) with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported reversal events, but it is undermined by a project-specific baseline, absence of a stated buffer pool, and a high volume of unresolved corrective actions. Multiple contradictions across documents—particularly in verified ERR figures, usage rates, and fNRB methodology—reduce confidence in the data trail. The project has consistently under-delivered relative to PDD projections, which protects against over-crediting but signals weak implementation planning.

Red Flags

  • Twelve contradictions across documents, including a 3.9× discrepancy in verified ERR (16,197 in the 2019 monitoring report vs 62,516 in the issuance record), raising questions about which figure is authoritative
  • Five open Findings and Recommendations (FAR 01–05) remain unresolved, including the absence of a VPA-level fNRB report and unaddressed SDG indicator documentation
  • Usage rate shows a contradiction: the PDD assumes 0.9 (90%) while the 2017 monitoring report records a weighted average of 97.1%, and the 2019 monitoring report reports 0.9—unclear which figure was actually applied in credit calculations
  • The fNRB method is stated as 'national default' in the 2019 monitoring report but 'local field' in the 2013 validation report, and the fNRB value of 0.82 is not independently verified in the extracted record

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
32320
2014
3,6773,6770
2015
6,0086,0080
2016
10,0009,95050
2017
10,0009,800200
2018
10,00010,0000
2019
10,00010,0000
2020
10,00010,0000
Total59,71759,467250

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

5% quantified deduction applied

Baseline

Project-specific, reassessed 2024

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents