Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticBurkina FasoGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-12 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Kourwéogo

GS-1402 ↗ · current registry ID: GS6419

#621of 1329 in Industrial#23of 33 in Burkina Faso#948of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.9/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard cookstove project in Burkina Faso with VVB-confirmed additionality and a quantified leakage deduction, but undermined by a significant usage-rate decline (from 95% assumed in the PDD to roughly 70–82% verified), reversal risk that was never explicitly addressed, and ten cross-document contradictions that erode confidence in the underlying data. The low extraction confidence and absence of a lifetime ex-ante ERR figure limit the ability to verify over- or under-crediting.

Red Flags

  • Usage rate assumed in the PDD (95%) is far above the verified rate (69.9% in 2022, 82.35% in 2025), creating a material over-crediting risk if the original assumption was used in early vintages
  • Reversal events are marked as 'not addressed' in the verification record; for cookstoves, stove breakage and abandonment are the primary permanence risk and no buffer or credit-retirement mechanism is documented
  • Ten contradictions across documents (leakage %, ERR figures, usage rate, crediting period, safeguards, grievance mechanism, monitoring method) indicate significant data-quality and record-keeping issues
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated 'low', meaning at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the extracted facts
  • No lifetime ex-ante ERR estimate was found in any available document, preventing a proper pro-rata over/under-delivery check

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
7,8707,8700
2020
9,7529,568184
2021
9,8298878,942
2022
8,16008,160
Total35,61118,32517,286

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Reversal not addressed

Leakage

Quantified but contradictory (0.95% vs 5%)

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance, benefit-sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents