Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticMyanmarGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1729 Myanmar Stoves Campaign - Soneva in Myanmar - VPA No. 009

GS-1487 ↗ · current registry ID: GS6599

#455of 1329 in Industrial#10of 25 in Myanmar#714of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Myanmar Stoves Campaign is a Gold Standard cookstove project with VVB-confirmed additionality and documented safeguards, but it carries moderate risk from a project-specific baseline, a very low leakage deduction (0.95%) that conflicts with the monitoring report's 5%, and a verified usage rate of 52.63% that is far below the 100% assumption. Reversal risk is not addressed, and multiple data contradictions across documents reduce confidence in the reported figures.

Red Flags

  • Verified usage rate of 52.63% (verification report, 2024) is less than half the 100% assumed in the methodology, raising over-crediting risk
  • Leakage deduction of 0.95% in the verification report conflicts with 5% in the monitoring report; the lower figure is extremely low for a household cookstove project
  • Reversal events are explicitly not addressed in the verification report, leaving permanence risk unquantified for a project where stoves can break or be replaced
  • Six contradictions identified across documents, including differing crediting periods, usage rates, and monitoring methods

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
7,9077,9070
2019
7,9657,821144
2020
5,1125,1120
2021
4,70084,692
2022
3,04103,041
Total28,72520,8487,877

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Reversal risk not addressed

Leakage

0.95% deduction contradicted by 5% in monitoring report

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents